Affirmative Action in Medicine: Improving Health Care for by James L. Curtis

By James L. Curtis

Affirmative motion courses have considerably replaced American medication for the higher, not just in clinical institution admissions and entry to postgraduate education but in addition in bringing the next caliber of healthiness care to each person. James L. Curtis ways this crucial transition from old, statistical, and private views. He tells how over the process his scientific schooling and profession as a psychiatrist and professor--often because the first or basically African American in his cohort--the prestige of minorities within the clinical professions grew from a tiny percent to a much more equitable illustration of the yank inhabitants. Advancing arguments from his prior ebook, Blacks, scientific colleges, and Society, Curtis evaluates the results of affirmative motion efforts over the last thirty years. He describes ambitious obstacles to minority entry to medical-education possibilities and the ensuing difficulties confronted by way of minority sufferers in receiving clinical remedy. His growth file features a evaluation of 2 thousand minority scholars admitted to U.S. scientific faculties in 1969, following them via commencement and their careers, evaluating them with the careers of 2 thousand in their nonminority friends. those samples offer an immense examine clinical colleges that, whereas heralding dramatic development in health care professional schooling and coaching chance, exhibits a lot room for extra development. A uncomplicated hurdle keeps to stand African americans and different minorities who're nonetheless restrained to segregated neighborhoods and inferior tuition platforms that stifle complete scholastic improvement. Curtis urges us as a kingdom to advance all our human assets via a variety of affirmative motion courses, therefore bettering health and wellbeing deal with each person. James L. Curtis is scientific Professor Emeritus of Psychiatry, Columbia college collage of Physicians and Surgeons.

Show description

Read Online or Download Affirmative Action in Medicine: Improving Health Care for Everyone PDF

Similar health policy books

Children's Health, the Nation's Wealth

Kid's overall healthiness has essentially greater over the last numerous many years. major and confident earnings were made in reducing premiums of baby mortality and morbidity from infectious ailments and unintentional motives, greater entry to future health care, and aid within the results of environmental contaminants similar to lead.

Silicone survivors: women's experiences with breast implants

Susan Zimmermann talked with 40 ladies approximately essentially the most delicate problems with physique photo and well-being - their breasts, the manager characteristic of femininity. within the aftermath of the early Nineties controversy over using silicone breast implants, how do girls choose to suffer surgical procedure to reinforce or reconstruct their our bodies?

Implementing a National Cancer Clinical Trials System for the 21st Century: A Workshop Summary

Medical trials allow clinical discoveries to increase sufferer care, as well as informing and guiding next examine. The nationwide melanoma Institute's (NCI's) scientific Trials Cooperative crew software works to enhance sufferer care and examine. The Cooperative crew software has been instrumental in developing the criteria for melanoma sufferer care and scientific study tools.

The Economics of Social Capital and Health

This booklet defines the sector of social capital and wellbeing and fitness. during the last twenty years, there was a attractiveness of the significance of social capital (usually outlined as ties in the neighborhood, attachment to the group, and participation in neighborhood actions) and its influence at the well-being of these in that group.

Extra info for Affirmative Action in Medicine: Improving Health Care for Everyone

Sample text

0 percent. S. 1 percent of first-year places. S. medical students that year (Gordon and Johnson 1977). 2 percent of all unsuccessful applicants. In that sense New York was simultaneously the biggest winner and the biggest loser, by the sheer weight of its proportion of the applicant pool. 5 percent of all unsuccessful applicants. S. medical students, demonstrating a smaller contribution compared to New York. Both states, however, exported more firstyear students to other states than they accommodated in total enrollment capacity.

Special preference also was given to children of faculty members, and lesser but some attention was given to children of alumni and the spouses of enrolled students. In order to obtain geographic and social diversity, an effort was made to admit a few students from schools in different parts of the country, and to admit some students from public as well as from private schools, although a definite preference went to applicants from prestigious institutions, whether public or private. Admissions committees have enough flexibility to bend their admissions to serve a number of purposes, as long as the accepted student does not carry too great a percentage of academic risk.

When I was admitted to the University of Michigan in 1943 I was the only Black student in a class originally of 175 and of whom 145 graduated. Probably I was the only Black student that year as a consequence of military service. Already accepted into the Medical School I was drafted and as a result of my test scores was made a member of the Army Specialist Training Corps for Blacks, since the military was at that time segregated. I was slated to study engineering, but because I had already been accepted for the Michigan Medical School, Albion College and the University of Michigan requested that I go to Medical School.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.05 of 5 – based on 3 votes